Two Types of Tight Timeline

A tight timeline is one of the most common causes of project stress.

It’s basically tied for #1 with tight budgets, which we discussed earlier.

Deadlines are approaching. Teams are overlapping. People are working late. Everything is compressed and urgent.

But “tight timeline” can mean different things. And different problems create the exact same feeling. So we tend to respond the same way. We just push harder, compress more, and hope it works.

In practice, there are at least two types of tight timelines.

The first comes from uncertainty. Decisions are slow, scope is shifting, content is unresolved, and work is being redone. The schedule exists, but the sequence is unstable. This is fixable — if you can change the process.

The second comes from capacity. Fabrication takes as long as it takes. Installation has a fixed window. Staffing and resources are limited. In this case, the timeline may actually be impossible. This is not fixable — unless you change the project.

Both feel the same. But they require different responses.

One needs faster decisions. The other needs less scope, or more time.

Here’s the thing:

Tight timelines don’t arise from one type of problem. There are at least two.

Which type have you got?

Warmly,
Jonathan

- - - - - - - - - - - -

MtM Word of the Day:
Scope. The full extent of work required in a project. This includes all tasks, deliverables, timelines, and responsibilities. Scope outlines what designers, fabricators, and contractors must achieve, and therefore serves as the basis for all contracts and budgets.