Nobody Wants an Exhibition

Nobody wants an exhibition, just for the sake of an exhibition.

They want what an exhibition achieves.

This MtM note is about outputs versus outcomes. Similar words, a universe apart.

An output is the literal physical result of your work: a completed gallery, display cases set up, media programs running, graphics on the walls.

If you took a photo of that output, it would be a classic interior shot, from one far corner. A clean, beautiful exhibition. No visitors to block the view.

An outcome is the actual change in the visitor resulting from that output. Learning, empathy, belonging, curiosity, civic action.

Now, if you photographed that outcome, it wouldn’t be an empty gallery. It would be a fascinated visitor, a child pointing, a debate starting, a moment of recognition.

Exhibitions are outputs. But boards, funders, and communities are interested in outcomes.

Outputs are largely (but never entirely) within our control. We can design, fabricate, and install them on time and on budget, to rave reviews.

But outcomes are what visitors then do with our outputs. Designing for outcomes requires understanding visitor experience: attention, emotion, prior knowledge, social context. It’s harder to do. But what if you don’t?

Here’s the thing:

If your exhibition is perfect as an output — flawless lighting, perfect alignment, great design reviews — but doesn’t make a difference for anyone, has it succeeded?

Nobody wants an exhibition.

Warmly,
Jonathan

- - - - - - - - - - - -

MtM Word of the Day:
Visitor experience. A visit, from the visitor's perspective. Encompasses all emotional, cognitive, and physical aspects from arrival to exit. An ideal visitor experience is immersive, educational, accessible, and memorable.